I rise to address the gentleman's amendment to eliminate funding for the East-West Center. Historically the House has not included funding the center in the subcommittee bill, not because the center's work is not useful or is wasteful but because of the need to address other more important diplomatic and development priorities. Strong advocates have urged the House to continue funding in conference negotiations. The committee again considered eliminating funding in the CR. But we were advised by the center that their projected obligations through March of this year exceeded $8 million. As a result, the decision was made to continue the center's funding, but at half of last year's level to adjust for what was planned to be spent. Having said that, I share the gentleman's objective, and I'm prepared to accept the amendment with the understanding that the $8 million in obligations during the CR period will preclude us from eliminating the agency entirely.
Kay Granger: “I rise to address the gentleman's amendment to eliminate funding for the East-West Center. Historically the House has…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses funding for the East-West Center and its importance in diplomatic priorities.
Share
More from Kay Granger
I missed today's votes due to circumstances beyond my control. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall no. 86.
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I yield to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Ryan), the chairman of the Legislative Branch Subcommittee.
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chair, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Bishop), the chairman of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Republicans are working on policies that will grow and strengthen our economy. We will also find ways to reduce spending without impacting our Nation's defense, our commitment to our veterans, or the services that Americans depend upon.





