The gentleman is correct. The committee increased funding for Tomahawk production 2 years in a row. Using this funding for other purposes is contrary to congressional direction, and this is the second year in a row that the Navy has blatantly disregarded our instructions. The action by the Navy led the committee to recommend a rescission of prior year funding for Tomahawks. Despite this rescission, the committee remains supportive of additional Tomahawk production and is awaiting a revised plan from the Navy on how they will spend the previously appropriated funding for missile production. I assure the gentleman from Utah that the committee will revisit this issue in conference, when the Navy indicates affirmatively they will use additional funding solely for missile production.
Kay Granger: “The gentleman is correct. The committee increased funding for Tomahawk production 2 years in a row. Using this funding…”
Share
More from Kay Granger
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Madam Speaker, as I said at the outset, this continuing resolution keeps the government open while the Appropriations Committees in the…
I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from Connecticut will be postponed. Amendments En Bloc No. 4 Offered by Ms. DeLauro of…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from Connecticut will be postponed. Amendment No. 137 Offered by Ms. Tlaib The Acting…





