Would you be prepared to say that the BRAC that Congress enacted is going to continue as Congress has directed?

I don't see the wisdom of this policy, and especially since the subcommittee has a history of not allowing congressional inserts unless the project is a validated DOD requirement in a FYDP.

It just seems like you would want to stand it up as early as possible.

So you are moving on schedule, as long as the MILCON stays on schedule, to move those troops as originally determined earlier in BRAC?

I believe we need to look at that standard as for what it is that newspaper companies and how they can get a fair return for the investment they're making and the journalism we're publishing digitally.

This is such an appropriate and timely subject for us to discuss.

I hope that we can come to some conclusions that will not just be another highway authorization bill.

Many of those states, including Texas, are forced to bear an unfair burden through the current funding scheme.

it seems like Texas has moved in the direction of PPPs very heavily

I think this is the time to start this debate, and I hope that we can come to agreement on what is equitable for all of our states, not just some.

I think it is time for us to start looking at perhaps different ways of dividing this up where you have some high-growth states that are hurting for highway money.