And yet currently, despite the 15 years to raise those concerns under the current law, they would have an additional 6 years to interrupt the project with an injunction or a temporary restraining order, correct?
Ratcliffe questions the extended legal interruptions affecting water project timelines.
Share & report
More from John Ratcliffe
To the brave CIA officers listening around the world, if all of that sounds like what you signed up for, then buckle up and get ready to make a difference.
I think that, you know, intelligence is such that we are constantly gaining new information even where we have limited sources and methods.
Yes, and I think that, you know, as again, there were instances that were documented by the analytic ombudsman that reflect the fact that when it came specifically to China, the country of China, that some of our intelligence and our…
I think that, you know, as again, there were instances that were documented by the analytic ombudsman that reflect the fact that when it came specifically to China, the country of China, that some of our intelligence and our analytic…
Other voices in this conversation
