And yet currently, despite the 15 years to raise those concerns under the current law, they would have an additional 6 years to interrupt the project with an injunction or a temporary restraining order, correct?
Ratcliffe questions the extended legal interruptions affecting water project timelines.
Share
More from John Ratcliffe
My communications, to be clear, in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information.
I want to give you a chance to think about that, and you saw the response, that President Zelenskyy put out a statement saying 'I'm ready for peace, and I want Donald Trump's leadership to bring about that peace.'
I think on the military front and the intelligence front, the pause that allowed that to happen, I think will go away.
Other voices in this conversation
