There is no Fourth Amendment violation, the bill makes no reference whatsoever to the issue of searches, and there is no objection to the gentlewoman's request for a study. But there continues to be, and needs to be, objection and opposition to a sunset provision with respect to the authority that probation officers need to perform their duties safely and effectively. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the previous question is ordered on the bill and on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee). The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee). The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the noes appeared to have it.
John Ratcliffe: “There is no Fourth Amendment violation, the bill makes no reference whatsoever to the issue of searches, and there is no…”
On the recordMay 19, 2017
Share
More from John Ratcliffe
Feb 25, 2025
agreed on regular contact in order to contribute to the international stability and security, as well as a decrease in confrontation in relations between Moscow and Washington
Mar 4, 2025
President Trump said, is he asked for a pause. In this case, as everyone saw play out, President Trump had a real question about whether President Zelenskyy was committed to the peace process.
Mar 25, 2025
I didn't transfer any classified information, and at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success.
Mar 24, 2025
With respect to the assertions and the allegations that there was strike packages or targeting information... the Secretary of Defense is the original classification authority.





