Mr. Speaker, there is no Fourth Amendment violation, the bill makes no reference whatsoever to the issue of searches, and there is no objection to the gentlewoman's request for a study. But there continues to be, and needs to be, objection and opposition to a sunset provision with respect to the authority that probation officers need to perform their duties safely and effectively. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the previous question is ordered on the bill and on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee). The question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee). The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the noes appeared to have it.
On the recordMay 19, 2017
Share & report
More from John Ratcliffe
Jan 27, 2020
As I said, we know tens of thousands of Americans will die this year, and we have to support DOJ's enforcement.
Apr 17, 2023
More and more analysts believe that lab leak is the most plausible, if not the only plausible, assessment to make.
Oct 20, 2020
We have confirmed that some voter registration information has been obtained by Iran and separately by Russia. This data can be used by foreign actors to attempt to communicate false information to registered voters that they hope will…
Apr 17, 2023
Well, with the caveat that we always have to be careful about protecting our sources and methods, particularly those sources and methods as it relates to what the intelligence community uniformly agrees is our No. 1 threat from a…





