I just want to continue saying I think that the objection of the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Hyde] goes to his view that the Attorney General did not act appropriately at that time. But that is a fact question. The fact of the matter is the law clearly gives the Attorney General the power to do that, and the Brooks amendment makes explicit that these independent counsel are so covered. That is the point of it.
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Bryant addresses the authority of the Attorney General in relation to the Brooks amendment.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I say to the gentleman, Mr. Mfume, let me answer you in the quickest way possible. The answer to that question is simply this: They do not want to have to reveal their lobbying contacts with the executive branch, and they have cloaked that…
the purpose is to require that the Forest Service place native biodiversity at the top of the list of its priorities in managing these lands. Native biodiversity is defined as one of the definitions which the gentleman has referred to…
My question is this, does the gentleman think that the rules of this place ought to permit him to have a lobbyist, whose job it is to influence him, pay for his greens fees?
The gentleman stopped reading too soon. If he kept reading he would specifically see that the statute already says that the specificity of information received and the credibility of the source are the key factors in her determination. So…





