I would simply say this to the comments by the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Burton] just a moment ago, and the others preceding him, that the fact of the matter is that campaign money goes into a campaign, and the money we are talking about here in one way or another ends up in our pockets, or relieves us of an expenditure. I think that is the difference. I would say one additional thing, we are also well underway here with a dramatic revision of the campaign laws, so it is not as though we are not paying attention to that.
John Hope Bryant: “I would simply say this to the comments by the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Burton] just a moment ago, and the others…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing campaign finance and ongoing revisions to campaign laws.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I would observe that the same taxpayers that the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Deal, was speaking of would have to pay the cost of the law enforcement which would result from having all these kids on the street, the cost of the schools…
With over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.
Let me respond briefly that the Constitution itself talks about impeachment as well as election. The two processes are compatible, according to our forefathers, since they completely understood that you had first to be elected in order to…





