I would say to the gentleman, because ``personal, financial, or political conflict of interest,'' all of those would be good grounds for going forward, but we have broadened it even further to say if it is in the public interest for any reason, she can include a Member of Congress under the coverage of this statute. We are trying to make it easier, not harder.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I might add that I want to again honor the Constitution by what we do today. I think we all share that. And while the polls seem to show one thing, they also seem to show that many people would like this President to resign, in fact a…
with over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.
Mr. Chairman, what is really at stake in the consideration of the Chrysler-Berman amendment is whether we are going to do anything meaningful with regard to numbers in this whole debate. The fact of the matter is that legal immigration…
I think it is one that we ought to pass, and I urge my colleagues to support it. It seems like we can agree on an awful lot of things today. We all want more education, better health care for our young people and we all want to make sure…
Other voices in this conversation
