I would say to the gentleman, because ``personal, financial, or political conflict of interest,'' all of those would be good grounds for going forward, but we have broadened it even further to say if it is in the public interest for any reason, she can include a Member of Congress under the coverage of this statute. We are trying to make it easier, not harder.
John Hope Bryant: “I would say to the gentleman, because ``personal, financial, or political conflict of interest,'' all of those would be…”
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
Integrate. The Federal Government now requires the school systems to be integrated, to permit all students to come to schools. Do you think that we should continue that policy?
Let me respond briefly that the Constitution itself talks about impeachment as well as election. The two processes are compatible, according to our forefathers, since they completely understood that you had first to be elected in order to…
With over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.
I urge Members to do what is right for our kids, do what is right for our neighborhoods, do what is right for our police departments. Do not put another burden on the school districts, and vote against this bill.





