The gentleman stopped reading too soon. If he kept reading he would specifically see that the statute already says that the specificity of information received and the credibility of the source are the key factors in her determination. So it is exactly like the language the gentleman is talking about. The problem is the second half of his amendment which requires the Attorney General to determine in 15 days if there is sufficient evidence of a violation, and that is the province of the independent counsel, not the Attorney General. So if we leave it to the Attorney General, then we have no independent counsel.
John Hope Bryant: “The gentleman stopped reading too soon. If he kept reading he would specifically see that the statute already says that…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Bryant discusses the implications of an amendment regarding the role of the Attorney General and independent counsel.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
I think it is all our responsibilities to take the next step and say what would be the actual result of doing what the gentleman is advocating. Nobody wants illegal immigrants to be in this country, but the simple fact is not one single…
the opposing side has made a point that Ms. Lewinsky said that the President never specifically told her to lie. Yet they had engaged in a very clear cover story for a number of months in terms of how she had access to the President when…
I guess we have moved from the spirit of Hershey and our bipartisan retreat and we are now talking about the radical right and calling names. I would remind the gentlewoman from California that this radical right that opposed this…
It is a difficult task to stand up here and follow the fine gentleman from Pennsylvania... let us do the right thing and vote for this amendment.





