You have got the same drag on the plaintiff as there is on the defendants, because the lawyer has to carry the burden. He is not going to do it unless he thinks he has a good chance of winning. That is the whole point of this. I would simply conclude by pointing out the argument, at bottom, on your side of the aisle is we do not have any faith in the judges, most of whom were appointed by Republican Presidents, and we do not have any faith in the American people when you take them 12 at a time and put them in the jury box and show them facts, so we are going to try to write the rules in a way to make sure nobody ever files a case unless it is an absolute slam dunk winner. I do not think that is fair to the middle class. I think you should vote for the Berman amendment.
John Hope Bryant: “You have got the same drag on the plaintiff as there is on the defendants, because the lawyer has to carry the burden.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the fairness of legal rules and the impact on the middle class.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
if they are coming to get a job and they have kids, the kids are coming. Do we want, as a matter of national policy, to have these kids wandering the streets? We might hear it said in a moment, well, the new version of this does not…
I think it is all our responsibilities to take the next step and say what would be the actual result of doing what the gentleman is advocating. Nobody wants illegal immigrants to be in this country, but the simple fact is not one single…
I guess we have moved from the spirit of Hershey and our bipartisan retreat and we are now talking about the radical right and calling names. I would remind the gentlewoman from California that this radical right that opposed this…
How does the gentleman distinguish, now? We are talking about a Federal issue here. Ought it not be the same in all States also, that we require they be in school?





