I really wonder if the gentleman understands what we are saying is what the gentleman has done is provide that the Attorney General under his provision has 15 days in order to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of a violation. And the statute has always said that they have 15 days to determine if there is a specific allegation from a credible source, and if there is, then there is a 90-day period in which an investigation takes place. I do not think the gentleman realizes the effect of the words he has written.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the implications of a provision related to the Attorney General's investigation timeline.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
The gentleman stopped reading too soon. If he kept reading he would specifically see that the statute already says that the specificity of information received and the credibility of the source are the key factors in her determination. So…
Again, I would emphasize removal is possible for an independent counsel for cause, and a serious violation of any of these standards would satisfy that requirement.
the answer is, the gentleman must perform his speaking duties within 48 hours of arriving and leave within 48 hours of speaking, and they must disclose every 6 months all that they spent on the gentleman on that trip. If the gentlemen can…





