I really wonder if the gentleman understands what we are saying is what the gentleman has done is provide that the Attorney General under his provision has 15 days in order to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of a violation. And the statute has always said that they have 15 days to determine if there is a specific allegation from a credible source, and if there is, then there is a 90-day period in which an investigation takes place. I do not think the gentleman realizes the effect of the words he has written.
John Hope Bryant: “I really wonder if the gentleman understands what we are saying is what the gentleman has done is provide that the…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the implications of a provision related to the Attorney General's investigation timeline.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
Well, I asked a question of the gentleman: Does he think the States should have the power to decide whether or not the schools are going to be integrated? ... So the answer is, yes, I do think that States should have the right to determine…
We're one America. America as a country is an idea. We can make it whatever we want. And that is not demonizing people. It's a dog whistle and it needs to stop.
How does the gentleman distinguish, now? We are talking about a Federal issue here. Ought it not be the same in all States also, that we require they be in school?
With over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.





