we have before us today a historic statute, a unique statute in our jurisprudence that grew out of a unique event in American history. That is the Watergate event of some 20 years ago. It resulted in the passage, in 1978, of a special provision that recognized the great difficulty that an Attorney General can have in objectively investigating and prosecuting another member of the President's Cabinet, a colleague with whom they work and with whom they are often close friends. And so a law was written with regard to about 60 very high officials in the executive branch. If there is a specific allegation from a credible source, it triggers a mechanism which can result in the appointment, by a court, of an independent counsel so that those cases may be investigated an prosecuted objectively and fairly. And there have been 13 instances like that. Half of them have resulted in no prosecution; the other half have resulted in very high profile investigations and prosecutions of which all of us are aware. This law has worked well for 15 years. Because it is novel and because it is unique, each time it is passed it has had attached to it a provision which provided that the law would expire at the end of 5 years, so it has been necessary twice to reinstate the law, to pass it once again. And it fell to us again, in 1992, to reinstate that law, 5 years having elapsed since it was last passed.
John Hope Bryant: “we have before us today a historic statute, a unique statute in our jurisprudence that grew out of a unique event in…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance and history of the independent counsel statute related to the Watergate event.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
we began considering immigration legislation after the Jordan Commission gave us a report outlining the problems and proposing to us a set of bipartisan solutions. In no part of the Jordan Commission report, or in any other study, for that…
I would observe that the same taxpayers that the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Deal, was speaking of would have to pay the cost of the law enforcement which would result from having all these kids on the street, the cost of the schools…
As we discuss this addition of prescription drugs to senior citizens, we cannot talk about it in isolation. I think we have to place it in the context of Medicare as we talk about this. One of the first things that comes to my mind and I…
Mr. Chairman, what is really at stake in the consideration of the Chrysler-Berman amendment is whether we are going to do anything meaningful with regard to numbers in this whole debate. The fact of the matter is that legal immigration…





