He is not going to go through months and years of work; that is preposterous to assume that that is going on. It is not going on. That is why you have the rule of sanctions that the gentleman and I discussed. It has not been used very much. There are not very many cases in which it ought to be used. I think it is very interesting how the gentleman shifted the discussion from stopping frivolous cases to some kind of an incentive to settle. What you have here is a prohibition on an average person getting into a courthouse.
John Hope Bryant: “He is not going to go through months and years of work; that is preposterous to assume that that is going on. It is not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of sanctions and access to the courthouse during a legislative debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
How does the gentleman distinguish, now? We are talking about a Federal issue here. Ought it not be the same in all States also, that we require they be in school?
I urge Members to do what is right for our kids, do what is right for our neighborhoods, do what is right for our police departments. Do not put another burden on the school districts, and vote against this bill.
They made this pledge not under political duress, not in response to protest, but we thought out of conscious and clean hands.
Well, I asked a question of the gentleman: Does he think the States should have the power to decide whether or not the schools are going to be integrated? ... So the answer is, yes, I do think that States should have the right to determine…





