He is not going to go through months and years of work; that is preposterous to assume that that is going on. It is not going on. That is why you have the rule of sanctions that the gentleman and I discussed. It has not been used very much. There are not very many cases in which it ought to be used. I think it is very interesting how the gentleman shifted the discussion from stopping frivolous cases to some kind of an incentive to settle. What you have here is a prohibition on an average person getting into a courthouse.
John Hope Bryant: “He is not going to go through months and years of work; that is preposterous to assume that that is going on. It is not…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of sanctions and access to the courthouse during a legislative debate.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
H.R. 833 is a necessary bill, and this is a good rule to support to move that bill forward. H.R. 833 restores fairness and common sense and personal responsibility to a bankruptcy code that, in many ways, is out of control. Current…
I have over the years, though, become convinced that some adjustments are needed to our criminal law. Given the significantly greater ability of the criminal, particularly the terrorists, to freely operate worldwide, and given the…
In order to have effective bankruptcy reform, we need to have in this bill a set of uniform standards as to whether or not someone should be allowed to file in Chapter 7 or in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The reason I oppose this amendment is…
How does the gentleman distinguish, now? We are talking about a Federal issue here. Ought it not be the same in all States also, that we require they be in school?





