I understand the sentiments behind the gentleman's words, but the point is that we are only relating this to people who are registered lobbyists, who in effect are the lawyers in the courtroom. They should not be able to take the judge to lunch. That is what this is about.
John Hope Bryant: “I understand the sentiments behind the gentleman's words, but the point is that we are only relating this to people who…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the ethics of lobbyists and their interactions with judges.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
Integrate. The Federal Government now requires the school systems to be integrated, to permit all students to come to schools. Do you think that we should continue that policy?
How does the gentleman distinguish, now? We are talking about a Federal issue here. Ought it not be the same in all States also, that we require they be in school?
They made this pledge not under political duress, not in response to protest, but we thought out of conscious and clean hands.
With over 60,000 documents, in the presentation of the White House lawyer, Mr. Ruff, he made no challenge to the testimony of Betty Currie, Monica Lewinsky or anyone else in the factual situation that we have had before us.





