It is clear it does apply. The gentleman should not come forward and try to obfuscate this issue. Mr. Speaker, I reclaim my time. I also heard the gentleman from Florida get up a moment ago and make reference to criminal penalties. There are no criminal penalties in this bill at all. Where have you been for the last several months, I ask the gentleman from Florida? Why would you stand up and say there are criminal penalties in this bill? The gentleman made reference to the Department of Justice. This bill does not relate to the Department of Justice, it relates to an agency called the Office of Lobbying Registration. Another Republican Member complained about some amendments he had not seen until last night. These are the Republicans' amendments you asked for. We added them because you asked for them. That is why they are here. What is at stake here today is very simply this: Do you folks want to join us in making it against the law for lobbyists to buy a free meal for a Member of Congress or not? Do you want to join with us in making it against the law for a lobbyist to pay for golf and entertainment for Members of Congress or not? Do you want to join with us in making it against the law for lobbyists to pay for travel with us or not? That is what is at stake here.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of a bill related to lobbying and its regulations.
Share
More from John Hope Bryant
The response is very simple. It is public land. Even private foresters are moving away from clearcutting. Why would we want on land owned by you and me and our neighbors to strip the land bare, down to the flat muddy soil, and cause all of…
My question is this, does the gentleman think that the rules of this place ought to permit him to have a lobbyist, whose job it is to influence him, pay for his greens fees?
I would simply say this to the comments by the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Burton] just a moment ago, and the others preceding him, that the fact of the matter is that campaign money goes into a campaign, and the money we are talking about…
first I would like to respond by saying that the gentleman's very strong remarks about the intent of the Rules Committee, or our intent in carrying this bill, I think, are perhaps a little bit stronger than they should be, to say the…





