Mr. President, reserving the right to object, again, our colleagues won't take yes for an answer. The amendment of the Senator from Washington, along with Senator Blunt, the chairman of the Appropriations subcommittee responsible for this, actually obtained cloture and will pass tomorrow--tomorrow--as part of this underlying appropriations bill, assuming that there are no other objections or that people want to finish that legislation. So I don't really understand why they continue to refuse to take yes for an answer. I would say to my friend from Washington: Would the Senator modify her request to include my language at the desk, which has the exact same funding levels as the Blunt-Murray amendment but includes a pay- for using the prevention fund in the Affordable Care Act? The PRESIDING OFFICER. Does the Senator from Washington so modify her request?
On the recordMay 18, 2016
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from John Cornyn
May 12, 2025
Madam President, America is an exceptional nation: freedom of religion, freedom of speech and of the press; private property rights; free and fair elections; the rule of law and an independent judiciary. All of these help make us…
Mar 6, 2025
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll. The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. (Mr. CORNYN assumed the Chair.)
Jul 16, 2025
I pointed out to him, and he knows this, that if he endorsed me, the race would be over.
May 1, 2025
Mr. President, for the information of all Senators, we will have one rollcall vote at 5:30 p.m. on Monday on the motion to proceed to H.J. Res. 61. ____________________





