Political Quotes

On the recordJune 3, 2014
17 years ago the Senate voted on something called a sense-of-the-Senate resolution designed to protect American workers and their families from misguided policy with regard to CO<INF>2</INF> regulations. Of course, CO<INF>2</INF>, or carbon dioxide, is a necessary element of life, and plant life depends on CO<INF>2</INF> for photosynthesis, which helps make them green. To hear some of the psuedoscientists talk about CO<INF>2</INF> here in Washington, you would think it was poison. Suffice it to say, 17 years later the Obama administration is trying to enact similar legislation that was rejected 17 years ago by the Senate in that sense-of-the- Senate resolution. Back in 1997 Members of the Senate were concerned that the Clinton administration might sign a global climate change treaty that imposed higher costs on the United States while exempting developing countries such as China or India. These concerns turned out to be well-founded. The Clinton administration did indeed sign such a treaty known as the Kyoto Protocol in December of that year, but it never got around to having it ratified here in the Senate largely because of a unanimous resolution this Chamber passed several months earlier. The sense-of-the-Senate resolution I alluded to a moment ago was voted on in July 1997, and it received 95 votes in favor and 0 votes opposed.…
Said by
John Cornyn
Republican · Texas

Share

More from John Cornyn

Jun 25, 2026

I mean, this, this is not — I don't know if there is precedent for it.

foxnews.com
Jul 17, 2026

He’s putting the best spin on it he can, but I can read and so can you, and I think his interpretation is not necessarily the only one.

huffpost.com
Jun 12, 2026

It does give some of us a little more freedom, and certainly leverage.

huffpost.com
Jun 9, 2026

If he wants to get 702 reauthorization passed, that sounds like the price that they're going to demand.

cbsnews.com

Other voices in this conversation