I would say to my friend from California, the problem in this instance is this shooter was a licensed security guard. He was guarding a courthouse. He also had a firearms license from the State of Florida. So there is nothing about her amendment that would have prevented him from purchasing a firearm. Indeed, the only thing that might have happened would be that the FBI would be notified under the 5-year lookback provision, but the FBI had already conducted two investigations of this particular shooter and had cleared him, notwithstanding all of the troubling signals we see now in retrospect. So I still believe there is nothing in the Feinstein amendment that would have prevented this shooter from purchasing firearms because he had a firearms license already and had previously been cleared by two FBI investigations and taken off the watch list. Madam President, I yield the floor.
On the recordJune 20, 2016
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from John Cornyn
Jul 23, 2026
“The agreement says it can’t be changed, but except by, you know, the parties, so that would have to be in writing,” Cornyn said.
Jul 15, 2026
We, you know, I saw the initial diagnosis of a dissected aorta — which is terrible, I mean, obviously, that could cause his death — but given where he was and the sorts of things he was advocating for, I think we just ought to resolve all…
Jul 23, 2026
Hardworking Texans and small businesses are too often bogged down by financial stress, bureaucratic hurdles, or the repercussions of honest mistakes when trying to navigate the tax code in good faith.
Jul 22, 2026
Those are the issues we’re continuing to discuss with the administration to see whether we can get a modification of the settlement agreement.





