Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 16, 2015
tomorrow morning the Senate will be casting a very important vote. We will be voting on a piece of legislation called the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act, which currently has 12 Democratic cosponsors and virtually an equal number of Republican cosponsors. In other words, this is generally bipartisan legislation. As further evidence of its bipartisan support, this bill passed unanimously out of the Senate Judiciary Committee in February, and it enjoys the support of more than 200 victims' rights and law enforcement organizations. But as everyone in this Chamber knows, Senate Democrats have said they will filibuster this bipartisan legislation that is designed to provide justice for victims of trafficking because it contains a particular provision they have voted for on a number of occasions and, indeed, have chosen to cosponsor. It is unconscionable and shameful and more than that it is just simply baffling to me. The reason it is so shameful is because there are children waiting for our help. The average victim of human trafficking in the United States is a young girl between the age of 12 and 14 years of age. Children are being abused and literally sexually assaulted while apparently some of our colleagues on the other side of the aisle have decided to try to make a political point. It is baffling because my colleagues have voted for essentially this very same provision in one form or another time and time and time again.…
Said by
John Cornyn
Republican · Texas

Share

More from John Cornyn

Jul 23, 2026

The only way it seems like you can get the administration’s attention on some of these funding issues is by using the leverage to withhold votes on nominees.

talkingpointsmemo.com
Jul 23, 2026

“It’s not good enough,” Cornyn told HuffPost on Tuesday.

huffpost.com
Jun 25, 2026

I mean, this, this is not — I don't know if there is precedent for it.

foxnews.com
Jul 17, 2026

We needed to set the record straight there because I think some people are under the impression that just because he says, ‘Well, we’re not going to pursue the weaponization fund,’ that it couldn’t be revived at a later time.

huffpost.com

Other voices in this conversation