John Cornyn actually said...

But when the courts decide to identify an unenumerated right and negate anything that conflicts with it, can't you see how they might just--...

It's just a--it's a mode of analysis by the Court that allows the Court to substitute its opinion for the elected representatives of the peo...

Thank goodness the Supreme Court has been willing to revisit its precedent, or we'd still be living with Plessy v. Ferguson or Dred Scott.

one of the most important questions under our constitutional form of government and the separation of powers is who decides