just briefly, roughly half the votes on this chart that the distinguished majority leader has described as filibusters were actually successful votes where cloture was invoked once the majority worked with us, allowed full consideration of the bills, and those bills actually moved forward and became law. On roughly half of the instances--I have not looked at the entire chart; this is the first time I have seen it here. But that is a perfect example of how we ought to be working together and not an example of obstruction, but it is actually a means that the Senate has been allowed to do what the Senate does, and that is to have full debate, a fair opportunity to offer amendments and then up-or-down votes on amendments and then pass legislation that goes to the President and is signed for the benefit of the American people. So I disagree with his characterization on at least half of those votes. They resulted in successfully passed legislation, not an example of obstructionism but of this Senate actually working the way the Senate should. I yield the floor.
John Cornyn: “just briefly, roughly half the votes on this chart that the distinguished majority leader has described as filibusters…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature of votes characterized as filibusters during Senate debate.
Share
More from John Cornyn
I will always support securing our border, but local officials on both sides of the aisle & other stakeholders have shared with me concerns about potential impacts in areas where the terrain already acts as deterrence for illegal…
All I want them to do is to confirm what he said in his sworn testimony before the Judiciary Committee.
There’s nothing we could do to rein in the president when he said he likes the fund and he wishes it still exists, but the fact of the matter [is] it’s dead, and that’s all we could do under these circumstances.
He’s lazy and doesn’t raise money. And he basically is not offering a very compelling case for his election.





