I do think we need to have a process which allows for an opportunity for amendments and debate. And if we do not have a process requiring a threshold of 60 votes, the temptation is going to be, again, for the majority leader to deny the opportunity for amendments, constrict time allowed for an amendment, for debate, by filing cloture, and we are going to see things shooting through here that have not had an adequate opportunity for deliberation. This institution has famously been called the world's greatest deliberative body, but I daresay we have not demonstrated that in recent memory. This is not a problem with the rules. This is the way the rules have actually been implemented. I think we have learned an important lesson from this and one I hope will help us respect the rights of all Senators, whether they be in the majority or the minority, to offer amendments and to debate these amendments not because they are about our rights but because they are about the rights, for example, of the 25 million people I represent.
John Cornyn: “I do think we need to have a process which allows for an opportunity for amendments and debate. And if we do not have a…”
Editor's note · Context
Cornyn discusses the need for a process that allows for amendments and debate in the Senate.
Share
More from John Cornyn
If this were just between me and Todd Blanche, we would have worked this out, but, apparently, he’s getting some pushback from higher-ups at the White House. I don’t know who, but it doesn’t need to be this hard.
POTUS is mistaken if he believes concerns about the provisions in his tax lawsuit settlement are limited to me and Senator Tillis.
Well, there’s nothing we could do to rein in the president when he said he likes the fund and he wishes it still exists.
I think that’s a real danger. And I think in any election, it’s not enough to disparage your opponent. You got to talk about the positive things that you’re doing for people.





