The substantive parts of the motion to recommit are pretty straightforward. It would sunset the legislation if there is a negative net effect on the Federal budget deficit. That is the Latta language that we have already spoken to. It would change the rebate mechanisms so that the rebates go to the homeowner and not to the contractor. This would limit fraud and abuse. It strikes the $12 million EPA public information campaign. As I pointed out in my floor statement, bees know where the honey is, bank robbers know where the bank is, teenage boys know where the teenage girls are, the public will know how to get this money. And finally, it strikes the Home Star energy efficiency loan program. We already have record defaults in the home mortgage industry. We don't need to be leveraging that any bit more. With that, I would ask for a ``yes'' vote on the motion to recommit. I yield back the balance of my time.
Joe Barton: “The substantive parts of the motion to recommit are pretty straightforward. It would sunset the legislation if there is…”
On the recordMay 6, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses a motion to recommit legislation related to budget deficits and energy efficiency programs.
Share
More from Joe Barton
Sep 4, 2018
Mr. Chairman, my time has expired. Next time I would ask unanimous consent if I could ask the question and then answer it myself so that I could make sure I get the right answer I want.
Jul 10, 2018
It is my honor to introduce to the House of Representatives the new Congressman for the 27th Congressional District of Texas, the Honorable Michael Cloud. Michael is a husband and a father. His wife and three children are either in the…
Jul 16, 2018
It is not complicated if you are an elected member of Congress and all of a sudden Medicare recipients start showing up at their town, town hall.





