I am going to support the rule, but I am very opposed to the self-executing portion of the rule that takes the nuclear waste fund and puts it back on-budget. We passed the nuclear waste fund to take it off-budget, both in the last Congress and again in this Congress in the subcommittee and in the full committee. That fund has $10 billion in it at the current time, and it is adding about $800 million per year. Because of a budget amendment enacted several years ago, only $400 million is available for the fund to be dispersed. We need access to every penny of the $10 billion if we are going to build and operate a nuclear waste repository in the near future. I am disappointed the rule eliminates the provision that would take the waste fund off-budget. I hope later in this Congress we can put it back on budget.
Joe Barton: “I am going to support the rule, but I am very opposed to the self-executing portion of the rule that takes the nuclear…”
On the recordAugust 1, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the nuclear waste fund during a discussion on budget rules.
Share
More from Joe Barton
Dec 10, 2018
I think it is a measure of President George H.W. Bush that we all think of him as a personal friend. It is literally true that he had tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands, of men and women who considered themselves personal…
Jul 23, 2018
I don't want to speak for the Department of Energy, but the draft legislation allows, without going through the appropriation process, funds generated by using this facility for private purposes to be used for maintenance of the facility.
Sep 4, 2018
Every now and then, we have a day when it reminds us why we ran for Congress. Today is one of those days.





