We do need a farm bill, but not a farm bill that forces our neighbors to subsidize this program. Ninety-six percent of the world lives outside of America, and already we had the Democrat majority deny a trade agreement that could have opened up great trading opportunities for agriculture in America. We need a respect for private property rights. We need regulatory relief. When we have an EPA out of control trying to somehow deign animal manure as part of the Superfund hazardous waste site, you know that something is out of control. So our agricultural producers need help. But this is the wrong way to do it. Again, at a time of shrinking paychecks, at a time when $2.5 trillion of burden have been added to our children and grandchildren, why are we keeping alive a relic of the New Deal, not to mention at a time of the highest food inflation in almost two decades. And why we would take money away from some people to hand to millionaires is beyond me. We ought to defeat this conference report.
Jeb Hensarling: “We do need a farm bill, but not a farm bill that forces our neighbors to subsidize this program. Ninety-six percent of…”
On the recordMay 21, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing the farm bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jeb Hensarling
Jun 26, 2018
We have a President who is inculcating bigotry into policy. It is no accident that they are now talking about doing away with diversity visas, after the President has called certain countries in Africa S-hole countries. That is bigotry in…
Sep 26, 2018
But it is this Committee's responsibility to conduct oversight over FHFA and that includes your conduct as well.
May 22, 2018
I am now very pleased to yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Rothfus), the author of two different provisions in S. 2155 to bring clarity to the complex capital rules and flexibility to our savings associations.





