We are not talking about pollution. We are talking about endangered species and wetlands declaration, and we are saying that when an individual loses the benefit of their property and it is taken by the Federal Government, there is compensation that is given. You know, people can talk about collateral things to try to cloud the issue. This issue is about basic property rights and the protection thereof.
Discussing property rights in relation to federal government actions during a debate.
Share
More from Jack Fields
I appreciate all of the gentleman's kind remarks. I think it is refreshing for the public and the country at large to see both sides of the aisle working in an extremely complex issue area, working together and finding commonality. Mr…
It is the anticipation that the V-band is going to be cleared. The U-band will be packed, which will add value to the return of that analog spectrum. It is arguable that this will be more valuable spectrum.
It takes the money out of the local community, which the elephant is no longer protected by the community, but becomes a meat source, and it has a commodity, the ivory.
Money is not going to solve it, and when you think about the poacher, how do we get to those poachers?
Other voices in this conversation
