I apologize to the gentleman on the other side of the aisle that I do not have the statute book with me, but as the gentleman knows, the civil part of RICO is just one or two sentences, and that is that one or two sentences that has made a number of civil actions to be brought under RICO. That is not what our intent is.
Jack Fields: “I apologize to the gentleman on the other side of the aisle that I do not have the statute book with me, but as the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the civil part of the RICO statute during a debate.
Share
More from Jack Fields
First of all, I would be remiss if I did not point out that the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. Bliley] is once again bringing a very complex piece of legislation to the floor that is meaningful in reform and it is bipartisan in nature. For…
thanks to an amendment offered last year by the gentleman from Colorado [Mr. Schaefer], and adopted by the committee, the bill today requires local governments that choose to impose franchise fees to do so in a fair and equal way to tell…
Mr. Chairman, as we are having this debate I think it is important for all of us as Members not to forget certain points. Point No. 1 mentioned by Chairman Bliley just a moment ago is if you take this sentence out of the statute as the…
Two examples that have been prominently used in this particular debate on this amendment, Barings and Orange County. If we apply the requirements of Scienter under this particular statute that we are discussing, the defendant directly or…





