Mr. Chairman, some of the examples we have heard from the other side of the aisle, Milken, Keating, Leeson, they all share something important. Each of these acted with intent. Each of these acted with the intent to defraud. The legislation that we are considering today would not affect shareholder actions against those people or people like them in the future. Those people would be jointly and severally liable. That has not changed in our legislation, and, Mr. Chairman, I think that is a compelling point in ending this debate.
Jack Fields: “Mr. Chairman, some of the examples we have heard from the other side of the aisle, Milken, Keating, Leeson, they all…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation on shareholder actions during a committee debate.
Share
More from Jack Fields
I just want to take the time to thank him and also the gentleman from California for this fine work. This is a very sensitive area, very complex area, but it is a very important area for the American public, and I just wanted to…
I personally do not think it is going to work, and I think in countries like Zimbabwe and Tanzania, it, first of all, is a slap in the face of these countries that they were not consulted.
Did you ever envision that this law would be used to destroy the economic value of millions of items legally acquired by Americans over the years?
It takes the money out of the local community, which the elephant is no longer protected by the community, but becomes a meat source, and it has a commodity, the ivory.





