If I, as an adjoining property owner, do something to diminish your right as an adjoining property owner, I have a civil cause of action. But what we are talking about here is the homeowner, if there is a taking of that homeowner because of a wetland or an endangered species declaration, that homeowner has the exact same right as the property developer if they have a wetland or endangered species declaration. There is no difference.
Jack Fields: “If I, as an adjoining property owner, do something to diminish your right as an adjoining property owner, I have a civil…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing property rights in relation to wetland and endangered species declarations.
Share
More from Jack Fields
It takes the money out of the local community, which the elephant is no longer protected by the community, but becomes a meat source, and it has a commodity, the ivory.
I support the amendment, because it provides a more efficient mechanism for an auditor to report the discovery of acts of questionable legality to management, the board of directors, and, if necessary, to the Securities and Exchange…
It is the anticipation that the V-band is going to be cleared. The U-band will be packed, which will add value to the return of that analog spectrum. It is arguable that this will be more valuable spectrum.
I encourage you to get as much information as you can from our government, from international entities and come forward with a bipartisan collaborative process that really does work.





