I think this is an honest-to-goodness, legitimate attempt to clarify, and I also think it is an honest-to-goodness attempt to work with the other side of the aisle. Again I want to compliment the gentleman from California for doing that, and I want to go one step further. I think it makes the standard even stronger.
Discussing a bipartisan effort to clarify legislation.
Share
More from Jack Fields
since we spent most of today talking about intent, let us talk about what our intent is in this pleadings section. Let us also talk about what the effect is of our pleadings section. Does the legislation as it is currently drafted, and…
Mr. Chairman, as we are having this debate I think it is important for all of us as Members not to forget certain points. Point No. 1 mentioned by Chairman Bliley just a moment ago is if you take this sentence out of the statute as the…
we had the opportunity, first, to work on that piece of legislation. Second, the dynamics in this House and the Senate have changed. If you look at the requirements for explicit pleadings of scienter in our particular statute, I do not see…
It takes the money out of the local community, which the elephant is no longer protected by the community, but becomes a meat source, and it has a commodity, the ivory.
Other voices in this conversation
