Mr. Chairman, I rise, very respectful of the gentleman offering the amendment, to oppose the amendment offered today. While I, too, have concerns for the safety of our food that has been genetically engineered, we need to continue the FDA's oversight and expertise in this area. Handcuffing the FDA by prohibiting their review process has very broad policy implications. The risks associated with transgenic fish, and specifically salmon, are overstated. Claims that transgenic salmon will create genetic pollution are unfounded because only sterile all-female stock would be commercialized, virtually eliminating any risk of cross-breeding with wild salmon. Legislating the approval process of FDA has far-reaching implications which could negatively impact future innovations to improve our food supply and our health. We have a world to feed, Mr. Chairman, and I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment.
Henry Bonilla: “Mr. Chairman, I rise, very respectful of the gentleman offering the amendment, to oppose the amendment offered today.…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the FDA's oversight of genetically engineered food.
Share
More from Henry Bonilla
I reserve the point of order and claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes.
I will be very brief. The gentleman is sincere in his effort in bringing this amendment forward year after year after year, and the majority of House opposes it year after year after year; and once again we oppose it today. Mr. Chairman, I…
we have worked on this language, and I have corrected some problems we had with it. And we are happy to accept the language if the gentleman will accept our support for this.
I would be happy to do that. I have a tremendous amount of respect for the gentleman. There have been many unrelated issues that we have worked on together in the past, and we would be happy to do that.





