On the recordJuly 12, 2001
The Secretary could access that, that is correct. If the Secretary or we in this room agreed in a bipartisan way that it was not enough, we could come back and deal with that at the appropriate time.
Source
govinfo.govHenry Bonilla: “The Secretary could access that, that is correct. If the Secretary or we in this room agreed in a bipartisan way that it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Secretary's access to information and potential bipartisan agreement.
Share
More from Henry Bonilla
May 23, 2006
We have worked on this language, and I have corrected some problems we had with it. And we are happy to accept the language if the gentleman will accept our support for this.
May 23, 2006
I rise to reserve a point of order against the amendment. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman's point of order is reserved. Pursuant to the order of the House of today, the gentleman from California (Mr. Baca) and a Member opposed each will…
May 23, 2006
The gentleman is presenting a good amendment, and I would just like to inform the gentleman we would be happy to accept the gentleman's amendment if he would like to move it to a vote.
May 23, 2006
Yes, because until they can develop the rules, regulations and how it is going to work, there is nothing they can spend money the money on.
Other voices in this conversation
