In my own district in Texas, the majority of the farmers do not own the land they farm. This differs from many parts of our Nation, and in the past 4 weeks, while I was traveling in my district, the primary concern was whether this legislation provides a strong enough safeguard for the tenant farmer in receiving his or her share of the payment. Repeatedly I was asked what prevents the nonfarming landowner from not leasing the land for farming purposes and having the landowner receive the payments under this bill even though no farming takes place on the land. And, second, what assures the farmer that he will obtain his share of the payment?
Gregory Laughlin: “In my own district in Texas, the majority of the farmers do not own the land they farm. This differs from many parts of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns of tenant farmers regarding payment safeguards in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Gregory Laughlin
I first want to thank the distinguished chairman of our committee for turning this bill into a truly bipartisan bill, and I commend our last chairman, the gentleman from California [Mr. Mineta], for tying to work with us in the last…
I rise in opposition to the Hyde amendment, with all due respect to the gentleman from Illinois. It has been said no law enforcement people are in favor of the Derrick amendment, and they all want the Hyde amendment, and I am confused by…
the Laughlin-Tate-Brewster-Bachus- Parker amendment to the Emerson amendment is a balanced, reasonable amendment to address the ongoing problem involving section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. This…
I believe in the death penalty. In fact, I tried some murder cases where if the law would have allowed it I would have pulled the switch. But today we are faced with the Hyde amendment that has passed and the law is still the same and the…





