On the recordMarch 8, 1991
Okay. First, the environment. I have been surprised that in this country there has not been more of a highlighted moral outrage. I feel a moral outrage here. I feel that what he has done, laying waste to the assets of Kuwait, is brutal environmental terrorism. There is no excuse for it. There is no rationale for it. It is simply what we call the scorched earth policy, as he left. That is unacceptable. I think world judgment is going to take a while to mature in this regard. People here hate it, but there isn't that visceral feeling about what this man has done. As time goes by and the shooting has stopped, thank God, and people come back into Kuwait as they are, thank heavens, I think people are more and more going to be outraged by it. One of the reasons that we insisted on accountability and on one of the U.N. resolutions that called for compensation was because we felt so strongly about the environmental degradation. And Kuwait is entitled to compensation for this kind of environ- mental terrorism. And so are others who might be affected by that spill. So, one, we're very much concerned about it, and I think it's going to be a focal point. It hasn't yet been as much as I thought it would be--a focal point for indignation against this laying to waste, reckless laying to waste, of another country. What was your second point? Democracy and Regional Development
Source
govinfo.gov




