On the recordMarch 8, 1991
Well, again, I think it has to be one of mutual respect. I think it has to be one who fiercely recognizes and is willing to defend the territorial integrity of the country. I think it has to be one where we're forward-leaning on the peace process as it relates to Israel and Palestine. Because in these countries, no matter how good our bilateral relations, there's this feeling--hey, you ought to be doing more about that question. I see it as one where we will be tested by whether I am willing to do what we've said, be a catalyst for peace not just in the Gulf but up into Lebanon and down into the Israeli-Palestine question. But what I hope will happen is that because of the commitment we made, after great consultation--in your country's case, the Amir; the case of the Kingdom [of Saudi Arabia], with King Fahd himself; a close relationship with Mubarak--I hope that the United States will--and I think it is true in Morocco, although we had a little different standing for Morocco in this--I hope that there will be a recognition that we're credible friends. And this is an important point, that we have credibility. When we say we'll do something, we'll do it; we mean it. And that is an important point as to how the U.S. interacts with the Middle East from now on, it seems to me. If they say they're going to do what they say they'll do, I think that is important. I think a lot of lip service was given to that point, but for various reasons, including global reasons, Vietnam. People would--``Look, hey, do they really mean this? Are they really going to follow through?'' And I think that our credibility should be such in the area that we can work closely now as credible allies, credible friends. New World Order
Source
govinfo.gov




