On the recordSeptember 28, 2022
I would argue that it is not. Fundamentally, this bill took a bunch of taxpayer money, about $257 billion to be exact, and it invested it in intermittent energy sources, solar and wind to be exact.
Source
congress.govDan Crenshaw: “I would argue that it is not. Fundamentally, this bill took a bunch of taxpayer money, about $257 billion to be exact…”
Editor's note · Context
Crenshaw argues against the effectiveness of the bill, citing its investment in intermittent energy sources.
Share
More from Dan Crenshaw
Dec 18, 2025
Children suffering from gender dysphoria deserve care, dignity, and clinical compassion, but that compassion does not mean pushing them on a medical pathway that leads to irreversible physical harm. The answer is in evidence-based…
Dec 18, 2025
again, it has been stated that these so-called treatments are safe and effective and save lives. I ask the gentlewoman again: Cite your sources. Cite your sources. You won't. That is because you know that I know all of the sources that you…
Other voices in this conversation
