On the recordSeptember 28, 2022
I would argue that it is not. Fundamentally, this bill took a bunch of taxpayer money, about $257 billion to be exact, and it invested it in intermittent energy sources, solar and wind to be exact.
Source
congress.govI would argue that it is not. Fundamentally, this bill took a bunch of taxpayer money, about $257 billion to be exact, and it invested it in intermittent energy sources, solar and wind to be exact.
Crenshaw argues against the effectiveness of the bill, citing its investment in intermittent energy sources.
Share & report
More from Dan Crenshaw
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of subtitle B of title X, insert the following: SEC. 10__. SALE OR DONATION OF…
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to urge my colleagues to support an amendment that would increase the capabilities of small and medium law enforcement agencies close to the border to fight the Mexican drug cartels that are bringing deadly…