I have a brief response to the gentleman's remarks. This does not change at all the Safe Drinking Water Act that the EPA regulates. All it says is there is a timeline for that primacy application. It can always be denied within that timeline. By the way, the entire point of this is to reduce carbon emissions. It should be bipartisan. Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Pfluger).
Share
More from Dan Crenshaw
I am very proud to have sponsored this legislation and have fought this battle for many years. I think we could actually get it done this time. I am not sure that my colleagues even believe what they are saying. I think they know that…
in closing, let's just summarize what we have heard today. We have heard that so-called gender-affirming care is necessary, effective, prevents suicides, and helps vulnerable children. No one can cite any sources for that claim. They can…
Other voices in this conversation
