The question is not whether about supporting environmentalism or supporting cleaner air. The question is about how we do it and what the best way to do that is, and playing to our strengths as Americans.
Crenshaw emphasizes the importance of innovation in environmental policy over outright bans.
Share
More from Dan Crenshaw
I will just ask a simple question, because the statement was made that all the science suggests that these procedures are medically necessary. Can they cite their sources? Show me the studies. I cited mine. Cite their sources.
this claim is made over and over, that allowing gender-affirming care, as they call it, is saving lives. The problem with that claim is that there is no evidence to suggest that. All of the reviews, all of the studies, all of the…
If we want to win, if we want a better outcome for Ukraine at the end of these peace talks, you need to be uncomfortably aggressive.
The scary part about that analogy is that it is actually a lot less troubling to lose an eye than it is to completely change your gender. Completely changing your gender is a far more invasive procedure than losing an eye. Trust me, I know.
Other voices in this conversation
