It should not be, as we have heard one or two previous speakers, suggesting that those of us who support our version are going to somehow gut the Social Security system. That is furthest from the truth. And I say, if I hear anyone else saying it, which the gentleman from West Virginia is not, we intend to challenge those statements, because we can differ as to how we fiscally get to the point, but we cannot differ regarding the intent. There is no stronger supporter of the Social Security system in this body than this gentleman from Texas. I believe I share that with the gentleman from West Virginia.
Charles W. Stenholm: “It should not be, as we have heard one or two previous speakers, suggesting that those of us who support our version are…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending the integrity of Social Security during a debate on fiscal policy.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
one of the reasons why he has not brought it up is we cannot have the kinds of budgets that have been here in this body for the last 3 or 4 years and get to a balanced budget. We have to change our overall budget philosophy and go back to…
Mr. Chairman, I planned to offer an amendment today that would prevent the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from spending appropriated funding to add species to the endangered or threatened species list until the Fish and Wildlife Service…
my motion will make one simple change to the base bill. It will reinstate the original pay-as-you-go rules for all legislation which would increase the deficit. The motion would leave in place the discretionary spending limits and other…
I want to say it is with a little bit of mixed emotion tonight that I address this body for the last time. I guess it kind of came to me in a real way just a moment ago when my grandson, who is sitting beside me, asked me a moment ago…





