I am not standing here today defending the wool and mohair program of 1994. I fought for that then. I believed it was in the best interest. We lost. We lost. It is gone. He keeps talking about what used to be. I am talking about what is. And what is today is a $16.9 million program that is designed to help those who have survived. Twenty-five thousand wool producers are gone, out of business, eliminated. Seventy percent of our mohair producers are gone, eliminated, financially.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I am not standing here today defending the wool and mohair program of 1994. I fought for that then. I believed it was in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the current state of the wool and mohair program and its impact on producers.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
Mr. Chairman this is a very simple amendment to restore a little bit of accountability and honesty around here about our fiscal policies. My amendment would prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from dipping into retirement trust funds in…
I just think making a differentiation between disasters in Nebraska and South Dakota and Texas from those disasters in Florida, which I concur are very serious and should be addressed, but it really makes no real sense for us to set a…
I will say that everything he has said is 100 percent the truth. We did not mention Social Security. I deliberately did not mention Social Security because that is not the issue here. Everything the gentleman said in the letter from the…
an earlier speaker tonight said the economy is showing signs of some considerable improvement. Jobs are being created, GDP is increasing. Well, it should. We have borrowed $2.5 trillion in the last 3 rac{1}{2} years and spent it. We should…





