I am not standing here today defending the wool and mohair program of 1994. I fought for that then. I believed it was in the best interest. We lost. We lost. It is gone. He keeps talking about what used to be. I am talking about what is. And what is today is a $16.9 million program that is designed to help those who have survived. Twenty-five thousand wool producers are gone, out of business, eliminated. Seventy percent of our mohair producers are gone, eliminated, financially.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I am not standing here today defending the wool and mohair program of 1994. I fought for that then. I believed it was in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the current state of the wool and mohair program and its impact on producers.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
You are mischaracterizing my amendment. We are suggesting that the tax cuts be extended through next year. You are describing something that is not going to happen in my amendment, leaving a wrong impression with the people that might be…
I just think making a differentiation between disasters in Nebraska and South Dakota and Texas from those disasters in Florida, which I concur are very serious and should be addressed, but it really makes no real sense for us to set a…
We did it in 1997. It was Democrats like me that stood up with Republicans and got it done.
I come to the floor very disappointed because once again the majority has chosen not to allow the Blue Dogs to have our amendment considered. I would like to ask the gentleman from Washington, why did his committee allow 19 amendments…





