I misspoke. But if Members on this side would have an amendment of which we believe would be a better way to proceed regarding increasing the debt limit, which many of us are prepared to give the President what he has asked for as a clean debt ceiling increase, but we have a little different idea about how that ought to be done. But I understand the gentlewoman's rule that will be coming will again preclude Members on the minority side from having an opportunity to amend; is that correct?
Charles W. Stenholm: “I misspoke. But if Members on this side would have an amendment of which we believe would be a better way to proceed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the process of amending a proposal to increase the debt limit.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
That is the problem. That is the problem. It is a lack of understanding. PAYGO means you have got to come up with the spending cuts to take care of the amount of tax cut.
We did it in 1997. It was Democrats like me that stood up with Republicans and got it done.
I rise in deep sadness about the way this House is being run. A rule which denies the ranking member of the Committee on Ways and Means an opportunity to offer a serious, responsible amendment on an issue as important as this is should…
Sometimes it is rather amusing if you have been around for a few years, as I have. The last time this was seriously discussed, my friends on this side of the aisle opposed it. They believe the expedited rescission was a bad idea and that…





