I appreciate the good humor in which the gentleman is approaching the cornflower blue. But let me point out that the farm bill, the $73.5 billion, the gentleman, I believe I am correct, voted for that budget that provided the $73.5 billion that the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Combest) and I, the speaker tonight, and others then proceeded to mark-up the bill. It was not called those critical comments when it passed as a budget, but it is only after we have put together the policy in which the criticism comes. I would appreciate the gentleman acknowledging that as I was talking about balancing the budget, that I included farm spending in any reductions in spending that must accompany any kind of a new budget. That is what we are saying, and I do not think that is inconsistent at all.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I appreciate the good humor in which the gentleman is approaching the cornflower blue. But let me point out that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the farm bill and budgetary concerns during a floor debate.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I rise in deep sadness about the way this House is being run. A rule which denies the ranking member of the Committee on Ways and Means an opportunity to offer a serious, responsible amendment on an issue as important as this is should…
The Blue Dog budget this year proposed to spend no more than President Bush recommended that the Congress spend, and we intend to stick with that. When my colleague talks about spending and he talks about revising history, in the 8 years…
I want to say it is with a little bit of mixed emotion tonight that I address this body for the last time. I guess it kind of came to me in a real way just a moment ago when my grandson, who is sitting beside me, asked me a moment ago…
I appreciate the honesty in which he comes forward and with a straight face attempts to say why they denied us a chance. They can find time for 19 amendments, most of which are a joke. The rhetoric sounds good. What we offered in our…





