contrary to claims by some organizations opposing campaign finance reform legislation, the Shays-Meehan amendment would not prevent independent organizations from running advertisements or prohibit these groups from using the name of a Member of Congress or any other candidate in that advertisement prior to an election. I strongly support that. I do not mind any organization running anything, any individual running anything for my opponent in this year or in any other year. But I do believe my constituents that I represent have the right to know who it is that is spending the money in the 17th District of Texas, and then we will welcome that in the field of free speech and debate under all of the First Amendment rights and privileges that all of us find so dear. Under the Shays-Meehan amendment, any independent group can run advertisements expressing any opinion it wants at any time during a campaign so long as it complies with the standards of accountability and openness that apply to other political advertisements.
Charles W. Stenholm: “contrary to claims by some organizations opposing campaign finance reform legislation, the Shays-Meehan amendment would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Shays-Meehan amendment and its implications for campaign finance reform.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I will vote to increase the debt ceiling because to do otherwise would be irresponsible. But I think it is critical for us to seriously consider changing a little bit the game plan that we are under and that is reinstate pay-as-you-go. I…
one of the reasons why he has not brought it up is we cannot have the kinds of budgets that have been here in this body for the last 3 or 4 years and get to a balanced budget. We have to change our overall budget philosophy and go back to…
I appreciate the honesty in which he comes forward and with a straight face attempts to say why they denied us a chance. They can find time for 19 amendments, most of which are a joke. The rhetoric sounds good. What we offered in our…
I come to the floor very disappointed because once again the majority has chosen not to allow the Blue Dogs to have our amendment considered. I would like to ask the gentleman from Washington, why did his committee allow 19 amendments…





