I would just ask the chairman respectfully if the criticism that you just made of the Matsui amendment would not be equally applied to your bill on the floor, because it is the same language? Now, as far as the word ``raid'' is concerned, I would be perfectly willing to change that. We could say ``steal,'' we could say anything; but that does not help. But I want to yield to the gentleman. Is not the criticism that you made of the Matsui amendment equally applied to the bill that you are touting on the floor today?
Charles W. Stenholm: “I would just ask the chairman respectfully if the criticism that you just made of the Matsui amendment would not be…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the consistency of criticism regarding amendments during a debate on a bill.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
The gentleman has misstated the facts again. There is no budget. There is no budget until we get a House-Senate conference and we have a budget. If we had a budget, I would probably be standing up here agreeing with parts of what you are…
I personally do not believe we should pay for tax cuts by borrowing money against our children's future. That is why I support the Tanner substitute, which will extend the 10 percent tax bracket without increasing the deficit. This debate…
Reclaiming my time, I take back time because again you are totally misleading the body when you make that statement. If you go back to PAYGO as was originally passed in this body in 1990, repassed in 1993, repassed in 1997 with Republican…
We did it in 1997. It was Democrats like me that stood up with Republicans and got it done.





