Well, I do not know that to be a fact. In fact, regardless of the numbers that we might talk about, et cetera, we are still only going to be providing for what percent of the children?
Charles W. Stenholm: “Well, I do not know that to be a fact. In fact, regardless of the numbers that we might talk about, et cetera, we are…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the adequacy of provisions for children during a debate.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I personally do not believe we should pay for tax cuts by borrowing money against our children's future. That is why I support the Tanner substitute, which will extend the 10 percent tax bracket without increasing the deficit. This debate…
The gentleman has misstated the facts again. There is no budget. There is no budget until we get a House-Senate conference and we have a budget. If we had a budget, I would probably be standing up here agreeing with parts of what you are…
I just think making a differentiation between disasters in Nebraska and South Dakota and Texas from those disasters in Florida, which I concur are very serious and should be addressed, but it really makes no real sense for us to set a…
We did it in 1997. It was Democrats like me that stood up with Republicans and got it done.





