I want to choose my words very carefully today, because tomorrow I may eat them, just as I have heard many statements made on this floor today that I think are going to be eaten. When you govern this country based on political promises and polls rather than sound economics and good policy, the market will correct us. Let me remind everyone to start looking at what is happening to long-term interest rates as we have been debating this tax cut. They have gone up 4 percent, which means a tax increase on all soon-to-be homeowners. Now, this budget bets the ranch that the surpluses that everybody talks about are going to be there. If they are not, we are going to have a difficult time governing in this body in a bipartisan way. Social Security has been mentioned, and my number one disappointment in this budget is the fact that there is no money left for us to do the kind of bipartisan Social Security reform that I wanted to work with my President for. My colleagues have spent it all. Then my colleagues come in and sunset in 2011. Mr. Speaker, I wanted to do something for estate taxes. I wanted to have an immediate $4 million exemption for small businesses owners all over the country effective now. This one does not survive the laugh test. It does not even deserve the laugh test.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I want to choose my words very carefully today, because tomorrow I may eat them, just as I have heard many statements…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the budget and its impact on Social Security and tax policy.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I just think making a differentiation between disasters in Nebraska and South Dakota and Texas from those disasters in Florida, which I concur are very serious and should be addressed, but it really makes no real sense for us to set a…
Reclaiming my time, I take back time because again you are totally misleading the body when you make that statement. If you go back to PAYGO as was originally passed in this body in 1990, repassed in 1993, repassed in 1997 with Republican…
that is not the intent of this amendment. It is not to get into taxes or spending. It is just to say to this body, we have to make a decision regarding how much more we borrow on our children and grandchildren.
I will vote to increase the debt ceiling because to do otherwise would be irresponsible. But I think it is critical for us to seriously consider changing a little bit the game plan that we are under and that is reinstate pay-as-you-go. I…





