I believe it is in fact the amendment that we are considering today, Mr. Chairman. Also, we have heard a lot of other, I believe, well-intended but misinformed information concerning the cost of the technology that we are talking about on the particular card. We will be glad to provide the additional information as to the true cost of the technology involved in making this as counterfeit-proof as possible. Nothing is totally, counterfeit-proof, that is not technologically possible, but we can do a lot better job. I do not understand how my colleagues can argue that we should not do the best we possibly can in solving the problem.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I believe it is in fact the amendment that we are considering today, Mr. Chairman. Also, we have heard a lot of other, I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the amendment related to technology costs and counterfeit-proofing.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I personally do not believe we should pay for tax cuts by borrowing money against our children's future. That is why I support the Tanner substitute, which will extend the 10 percent tax bracket without increasing the deficit. This debate…
We did it in 1997. It was Democrats like me that stood up with Republicans and got it done.
That is the problem. That is the problem. It is a lack of understanding. PAYGO means you have got to come up with the spending cuts to take care of the amount of tax cut.
I come to the floor very disappointed because once again the majority has chosen not to allow the Blue Dogs to have our amendment considered. I would like to ask the gentleman from Washington, why did his committee allow 19 amendments…





