I believe it is in fact the amendment that we are considering today, Mr. Chairman. Also, we have heard a lot of other, I believe, well-intended but misinformed information concerning the cost of the technology that we are talking about on the particular card. We will be glad to provide the additional information as to the true cost of the technology involved in making this as counterfeit-proof as possible. Nothing is totally, counterfeit-proof, that is not technologically possible, but we can do a lot better job. I do not understand how my colleagues can argue that we should not do the best we possibly can in solving the problem.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I believe it is in fact the amendment that we are considering today, Mr. Chairman. Also, we have heard a lot of other, I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the amendment related to technology costs and counterfeit-proofing.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I appreciate that. I hope that the chairman and ranking member understand the concern here. As I said before, I have always followed the recommendations of the Air Force. We have some concerns, we are standing down the 13th bomb squadron…
Mr. Chairman, as we all know, and certainly the subcommittee is aware very strongly, the B-1 bomber is an integral part of our bomber fleet. The long-range strike capability of our national defense is enhanced by the superior payload…
I think it is a fascinating argument. We have heard it time and time and time again. My friend talks about the lack of controlling of spending. Let me remind, Mr. Speaker, you control this House. You control the Senate. You control the…
I am very disappointed in my friend from Iowa for once again taking the political line. I was not talking down the economy of the United States. Nothing that I said had anything to do with what my colleague just said. All we are saying is…





