I do not believe the chairman intended to misspeak about our amendment. It is not outside the baseline. It is within the baseline. It is outside your suggested baseline on spending. But I would point out you have already broken your baseline today with the Boehlert amendment, with the Everglades. You have already busted your own. So our argument is we are within the baseline, as I have described it. I do not believe you intended to misspeak upon that.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I do not believe the chairman intended to misspeak about our amendment. It is not outside the baseline. It is within the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget amendments and baseline spending during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I appreciate the honesty in which he comes forward and with a straight face attempts to say why they denied us a chance. They can find time for 19 amendments, most of which are a joke. The rhetoric sounds good. What we offered in our…
as a long-time independent voice of the people of west Texas, I rise to urge my colleagues in Congress to move forward with meaningful reforms to our national energy policy. Driving across the long west Texas highways, one cannot help but…
an earlier speaker tonight said the economy is showing signs of some considerable improvement. Jobs are being created, GDP is increasing. Well, it should. We have borrowed $2.5 trillion in the last 3 rac{1}{2} years and spent it. We should…
I will say that everything he has said is 100 percent the truth. We did not mention Social Security. I deliberately did not mention Social Security because that is not the issue here. Everything the gentleman said in the letter from the…





