according to the scores of Social Security by CBO, both of our plans require the very same dollars that the gentleman proposed to give back today in the long term. We would not disagree on that. I would just say, we are consistent. What the gentleman has said about our plan is correct, and what I have said about the Republican plan is correct. Let us not split hairs. We need that money. If the gentleman gives it back today, as he proposes, he is going to do damage to Medicare unless we somehow find the magic money somewhere else. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Charles W. Stenholm: “according to the scores of Social Security by CBO, both of our plans require the very same dollars that the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of budget proposals on Social Security and Medicare.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I hope our colleagues are paying a little attention to this tonight, because when we have been on this floor offering to be part of a solution, if people are watching this right now, folks are beginning to think, I would hope, okay, what…
Mr. Chairman, as we all know, and certainly the subcommittee is aware very strongly, the B-1 bomber is an integral part of our bomber fleet. The long-range strike capability of our national defense is enhanced by the superior payload…
that is not the intent of this amendment. It is not to get into taxes or spending. It is just to say to this body, we have to make a decision regarding how much more we borrow on our children and grandchildren.
I rise in deep sadness about the way this House is being run. A rule which denies the ranking member of the Committee on Ways and Means an opportunity to offer a serious, responsible amendment on an issue as important as this is should…





