Political Quotes

Charles W. Stenholm: the ARS has spent $100,000, roughly, studying the dump and has found it to be a typical dump with a little methane gas…

On the recordJuly 17, 1997
the ARS has spent $100,000, roughly, studying the dump and has found it to be a typical dump with a little methane gas and other benign chemicals, and therefore to do what Federal regulations would require the State of Texas, Texas A&M University would be very remiss to spend $3 million cleaning up something that they consider would not be necessary to meet any health reasons. So the State of Texas cannot by law accept a gift of land that contains a garbage dump. So this language striking the provision is required for ARS to reverse the existing statutory language directing the conveyance. That is all simply that the amendment does.

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a land gift containing a garbage dump in Texas.

Share

More from Charles W. Stenholm

Oct 5, 2004

I rise in support of H.R. 4620. H.R. 4620 was introduced by our colleague, the gentleman from Washington State (Mr. Nethercutt). I have been contacted by the Texas Wheat Growers, the National Association of Wheat Growers, the Wheat Export…

govinfo.gov
Sep 21, 2004

I will say that everything he has said is 100 percent the truth. We did not mention Social Security. I deliberately did not mention Social Security because that is not the issue here. Everything the gentleman said in the letter from the…

govinfo.gov
Oct 6, 2004

I just think making a differentiation between disasters in Nebraska and South Dakota and Texas from those disasters in Florida, which I concur are very serious and should be addressed, but it really makes no real sense for us to set a…

govinfo.gov
Jul 20, 2004

The gentleman has misstated the facts again. There is no budget. There is no budget until we get a House-Senate conference and we have a budget. If we had a budget, I would probably be standing up here agreeing with parts of what you are…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation